Jump to Navigation


When personal injury clients consult with a Chicago injury attorney claiming that they were injured by an object, product or other property the first question they are asked is who possesses the item that caused the injury. Often the answer will be I do not know or it was thrown away.

Illinois law recognizes a principal called "Spoliation of Evidence" which is a form of negligence. If a defendant destroys physical evidence which the plaintiff needs to prove his case, the law provides relief under the following special circumstances:

Where the defendant takes possession and control of the object, the plaintiff makes a timely request to preserve the evidence and further shows that "a reasonable person in the defendant's position should have foreseen that the evidence was material to a potential civil action." See: Boyd v .Travelers Insurance Co., 166 Ill. 2d 188, 194-95 (1995).

In the recent decision of TERRY MARTIN et al., v. KEELEY & SONS, INC., the Illinois Supreme Court took a hard line against a plaintiff seeking to invoke the spoliation doctrine. The case involved a plaintiff injured by a defective steel I-beam on a construction site. The defendant destroyed the beam hours after the accident and before the plaintiff could demand its preservation. The high court refused to vacate the trial courts dismissal of the lawsuit holding that absent a plaintiff's timely demand the defendant was under no duty to preserve the evidence.

It is difficult to reconcile Martin, id with the courts previous decision in the case of Shimanovsky v. General Motors Corp., 181 Ill. 2d 112 (1998) where the court found that a trial court could impose discovery sanctions upon a defendant for the destruction of evidence during the pendency of the case:

"a potential litigant owes a duty to take reasonable measures to preserve the integrity of relevant and material evidence." p 121

Decisions such as Martin and Shimanovsky cannot be justified beyond the Supreme Court's simple desire to limit spoliation of evidence lawsuits.

Please remember that if you or a loved one is injured as a result of a defective product, contact an experienced Chicago injury attorney to take the immediate steps to preserve the important evidence necessary to prove your case.

Contact Us

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Watch Firm Videos

About the Firm Chicago Illinois Personal Injury Lawyers

http://www.rickgrossman.com 866-942-8024 The attorneys at Steinberg, Burtker & Grossman practice exclusively in the area of personal injury litigation. For representation, contact the firm today in Chicago, Illinois.

Representative Cases

  • $8.3 Million to a tire serviceman who suffered brain damage and quadraparesis as a result of the explosion of a defective multi-piece rim.
  • $4.0 Million to the estate of a man who died after knee replacement surgery at Evanston Hospital.
  • $3.1 Million to the estate of a woman who died post child birth at the University of Chicago Hospital.
  • $2.2 Million to the estate of a woman that was killed in a roll over vehicle accident on the Kennedy Expressway.
  • $2.1 Million to the estate of a over medicated man who died at Rush University Medical Center.
  • $2.0 Million to a tuck pointer who fell from scaffolding.
  • $1.0 Million to the estate of an elderly woman who fell from her bed at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago.
  • $1.0 Million to the estate of a woman killed by a City of Chicago fireman.
  • $1.0 Million to the estate of a single woman killed in an airplane crash.
  • $1.0 Million to the estate of a man who died in Loyola Hospital as a result of the mechanical failure of a respirator.
  • $1.0 Million for the death of a baby from delayed treatment at Roseland Community Hospital.
  • $800,000 to a man from undiagnosed carpel tunnel syndrome at Rush University Medical Center.
  • $750,000 to motorcyclist who sustained severe injuries to his leg when struck by a motor vehicle.

Read More